Is Netflix bringing us together, or is its personalisation pushing us apart?
Watching what you want, when you want, can be a great convenience, but is hyper-personalisation diluting the cultural impact of advertising? Cat Botibol, Business Development Director at Secret Cinema, thinks so, and believes creativity works best in crowds.
Netflix’s record-breaking 19 million new subscribers proves something: convenience is king. The streaming giant has mastered the art of personalisation, curating hyper-tailored experiences that keep audiences hooked.
The company's success was partly due to their ability to make content easy to find and watch. By giving viewers exactly what they want, they were able to provide users with a high level of convenience. But, as Netflix gets better at knowing us individually, are we losing the magic of shared viewing?
The days of gathering around the TV for Friends finales or The X Factor voting nights feel like a thing of the past.
The days of gathering around the TV for Friends finales or The X Factor voting nights feel like a thing of the past. The increase of streaming services has changed how we consume content. We now watch on our own schedules, in our own bubbles, and are fed content designed just for us.
Even advertising, once the collective glue that sparked post-show debates and water cooler moments, has shifted towards hyper-personalised targeting.
Credits
powered by-
- Production Company MJZ
-
-
-
Unlock full credits and more with a Source + shots membership.
Credits
powered by- Production Company MJZ
- Post Production The Mill London
- Editor Russell Icke
- Director of Photography Jim Frona
- Director of Photography Joaquin Baca-Asay
- Agency Producer Nicky Barnes
- Creative Juan Cabral
- Director Nicolai Fuglsig
- Producer Nell Jordan
- Creative Director Richard Flintham
![](https://d17mj1ha1c2g57.cloudfront.net/v1/j-Yym6GYrHgtQmJqLJhPyKNvOrY/1024x576%23/80/shotsmag/production/clips/385b2670-cc42-4311-8823-549e213617c5/1682357847967.jpg?v=1&quality=80&format=jpeg)
Credits
powered by- Production Company MJZ
- Post Production The Mill London
- Editor Russell Icke
- Director of Photography Jim Frona
- Director of Photography Joaquin Baca-Asay
- Agency Producer Nicky Barnes
- Creative Juan Cabral
- Director Nicolai Fuglsig
- Producer Nell Jordan
- Creative Director Richard Flintham
Above: Campaigns like Sony's Balls became a talking point, a cultural moment.
But is this level of customisation actually isolating us? And, more importantly for brands, does individualised viewing dilute the cultural impact of advertising?
Recent research from neuroscientist Joseph Devlin reveals that shared experiences can intensify emotions. His team tracked heart rates during a live performance of Dreamgirls and found that viewers in large groups experienced greater emotional highs and lows than those watching alone or in smaller groups in his lab. This research aimed to understand how shared experiences in live settings can enhance emotional engagement and connection among individuals. It’s simple psychology, sharing an experience makes it feel more intense and memorable.
Advertising has always thrived on cultural moments.
Think about it: how often do you watch something funny alone, and barely crack a smile? Now, imagine watching it with a friend. The laughter becomes contagious, the moment more memorable. The same applies to advertising. A collective viewing experience makes ads more immersive, more talked about and, ultimately, more effective.
Advertising has always thrived on cultural moments—Super Bowl ads, Sony Bravia Balls [above], Cadbury’s Gorilla. These weren’t just ads; they were part of the cultural conversation. But, with streaming services shifting towards personalised ad models, we’re missing out on these moments of collective recognition.
![](https://d17mj1ha1c2g57.cloudfront.net/v1/lPe9xYJh9-oLeZT26J3_KKc8IPk/1280x/80/shotsmag/production/clips/4e89fd59-27a7-474c-9d6e-edba07eaa5e0/image003-1-1-1170x780.jpg?v=1&quality=70&format=jpeg)
Above: Peggy Gou’s Squid Game-themed rave, sponsored by Just Eat, became an experience people wanted to be a part of.
When everyone watches alone and sees a different ad based on an algorithm, the shared cultural experience is lost. The impact of an ad is no longer amplified by group discussion but, instead, absorbed in solitude, and that’s a missed opportunity for brands looking to create campaigns that stick.
Of course, content can still break through, but it doesn’t happen by chance. Squid Game wasn’t just a global hit because of its storytelling—it became a cultural event thanks to smart activations that went beyond the screen. One standout example is Peggy Gou’s Squid Game-themed rave, sponsored by Just Eat. This wasn’t just an ad campaign, it was an experience, a moment people wanted to be part of.
The impact of an ad is no longer amplified by group discussion but, instead, absorbed in solitude, and that’s a missed opportunity for brands.
While the rave sparked wide public discussion, the traditional Just Eat ad on Netflix didn’t generate the same level of conversation. This highlights the power of immersive, real-world experiences in creating buzz and engaging audiences. We recently conducted extensive research into what people want to feel from an experience, and we know that events that bring people together in person can strengthen bonds between digitally-connected tribes. Brand partnerships, live events, and cultural tie-ins made Squid Game feel bigger than just a show, transforming it into a shared event fans could enjoy together
![](https://d17mj1ha1c2g57.cloudfront.net/v1/ZJJBG_eGA6RL6sIDg9m5TNxKbIU/1280x/80/shotsmag/production/clips/d4244d67-cbdf-4093-9c2f-1e1f908f265c/gettyimages-1390197620.jpg?v=1&quality=70&format=jpeg)
Above: While personalised advertising can be useful, advertising should be designed for group experiences.
Our recent findings also show that our perception of fandoms has changed dramatically in recent years; fictional fandoms began to receive the same respect as sporting fandoms. You don’t need a Squid Game-level IP to create engagement. Smaller activations around niche fanbases, immersive brand experiences, and collective cultural moments can be just as powerful — if not more so—than hyper-targeted, one-to-one marketing.
Brands looking to make an impact need to rethink personalisation. Instead of treating streaming audiences as isolated individuals, advertising should be designed for group experiences. Imagine ad breaks built for households rather than individuals — sparking conversations, reactions, even debates. A campaign designed to be discussed, not just absorbed passively.
Brands looking to make an impact need to rethink personalisation.
Yes, personalisation can be powerful, but brands need to weigh the value of hyper-targeted messaging against the emotional and cultural stickiness of shared viewing. Ads don’t just need to be seen — they need to be felt.
While Netflix has truly mastered convenience and personalisation, there's an opportunity to explore the power of collective viewing experiences. The success of live-streamed sports proves that audiences still crave collective moments. The challenge for brands is to harness that same power across their advertising, by creating ads for shared viewing experiences in the home where viewers can discuss the content — not just during major events, but every day. Because in a world where everything is hyper-personalised, maybe the most radical thing a brand can do is bring people together.